Torque is the rate of change of angular momentum and so if the angular momentum of the sphere at any point is M, then,
Clearly the absence or presence of friction does not alter anything since it has no net torque on the sphere as seen from point O.
Newton single handedly brought about a new era in our understanding of the physical world, through his famous equation F = ma and the law of gravity. These laws successfully predict the behavior of all phenomena from the microscopic world to the astronomical world! Ofcourse, Einstien changed things once again but that was only after about 4 centuries. Solving Irodov dramatically helped me understand the power, elegance, simplicity and beauty of Physics. Hopefully you will enjoy the journey too.
2 comments:
The explanation provided (that the frictional force does not produce any torque about point O) appears alright, but look at the problem from a different perspective.
For the rolling sphere, first compute the linear momentum(P) at time 't' which is equal to (5/7)mgtsin(alpha) and then take its moment about point O. The moment arm is R and therefore the angular momentum about O is (5/7)Rmgt sin(alpha).
This is different from your answer. Why the discrepancy and where is the error? I'm keen to know.
I had posted a comment/doubt this afternoon but later I got the issue sorted out.
The answer lies in Problem 1.197 itself - I should have added the angular momentum of the rolling sphere about its centre of mass -(2/7)Rmgt sin(alpha)giving a total angular momentum about point O which is same as Rmgt sin(alpha).
Please ignore the earlier comment.
Post a Comment