data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c11c/0c11c8cdf1c612a3f2c9c91849ee3381113d2c05" alt=""
Suppose that the rod is moving with velocity v relative to the scale.
In the reference frame fixed to the scale:
As seen from the scale, since the rod is moving it would appear smaller. Its length would be
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a5a7/9a5a73016af23963414018dc230ce3f7b031838d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33bd3/33bd38acc5375c7e791a93825d08001e8fbb5c99" alt=""
In the reference frame fixed to the rod:
As seen from the frame fixed to the rod, the rod is stationary and has a length of l0 , however, the scale is moving with a velocity v. Thus, each unit of the scale will shrink and will be
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b50d1/b50d1e3a1de1ebedfe9c524d111dd722f38e0f82" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65d9c/65d9cccdb43a99ea43df9251adb28634a7c80c96" alt=""
From (1) and (2) we have,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d68c/4d68ce7ac8f1c79dcc17e56d5c095d181266c7c0" alt=""
1 comment:
Great Work! Would like to talk to you, please write back to -
john dot aron dot smith at gmail
Looking forward to talking to you.
Post a Comment